Music
– for many of us it plays an important role in our lives. We play it for
festivities and for funerals. We find lyrics we can relate to and that speak to
some of our innermost experiences and feelings. Years later, hearing a song can
be extremely evocative of events, places, or people. Although it is created and
performed by an artist or group of artists, we hear it and it becomes part of
our lives and, in some cases, part of society. And yet what of the artists who
give us this gift? How do they create a society that allows them to perform and
express themselves?
Two
recent films answer this question by chronicling different artists and musical
genres. This Jurisculture post will
discuss one film, Maestro, and the
following post will discuss the other film, Song
of Lahore. Maestro tells the
story of master orchestra conductor Paavo Jarvi and, in the process, tells the
story of orchestral society as a whole. Throughout the film, Maestro explores Jarvi’s personal
history as the son of a world-renowned conductor from Estonia, who spent much
of his youth in the Soviet Union due to his father’s work. As a child, Jarvi
explains that he grew up listening to music and benefitted from the lessons his
father gave to the family on music and on its importance in life and society.
This
was emphasized to a younger Jarvi when his father refused to stop performing a
song that the Soviet regime deemed subversive and was punished with quasi exile
as a result. Despite this, his father continued to support such music and both
he and young Jarvi understood the power of the music they performed as a source
of motivation and support for social movements. Indeed, as was later
demonstrated in Estonia’s “Singing Revolution” in which it broke free of Soviet
control, music has the ability to reach across a number of social groups and
create another society based on its lessons.
Following
Jarvi’s path to the US after fleeing Soviet control, the film chronicles the
rise of Jarvi as a young and talented conductor. It explores the Curtis Institute
of Music, an elite school for highly talented musical artists, where another type
of society is formed, this one of artists who have given their young lives to
their art and to perfecting it. They create a common bond of dedication and
love of music and their art in a way that might be difficult for the outside
world to understand but that provides them with a sense of belonging and place.
This, in turn, allows them to push themselves and to excel in order to create
the music that comes to have such special meaning to society and to individuals
the world over.
The
idea of the experience of professional musicians as forming a society unto
itself is further highlighted in Jarvi’s experience as the Artistic Director at
the Deutsche Kammerphilharmonie Bremen. Unlike other orchestras, in which the
musicians are employees, at Bremen the musicians who comprise the orchestra are
the owners. This increases the sense of investment and attachment that the
musicians have at the same time that it increases the pressure on them to
perform at their best and to bring in funding on a consistent basis. It is both
a benefit and a burden on the musicians – and particularly on Jarvi as the leader
of the orchestra. In this way, the Deutsche Kammerphilharmonie Bremen serves as
a microcosm of the realities faced by individuals and society – each must
perform at its best in order to succeed and also to survive. In doing this, a
close-knit family unit is formed, with musicians and staff members who could
receive somewhat better benefits elsewhere staying with a group of people who
love and support them.
At
the same time, the struggle to balance the reality of this world with the
reality of a personal world is demonstrated by Jarvi’s own need to balance his
professional world with his commitment to his two young daughters. Throughout
the film, Jarvi discusses this in terms of the sacrifices he has made for his
career and, as his children begin to grow up, the professional sacrifices he is
willing to make so that he can be an involved part of their lives.
In Maestro, the audience experiences more
than the story of music and the enjoyment of hearing beautiful performances by leading
artists in the world. The film exposes the reality of the music that is enjoyed
by millions across the world, from the study needed to become an elite musician
to the way that a world-class orchestra functions to the struggle involved in
balancing the personal and professional lives of musicians. By exposing these
struggles, Maestro highlights the
ways in which classical music, a genre that some view as out-dated, in fact
reflects the realties and struggles of modern society in the lives of the
musicians who perform it as much as in the emotions it conveys and evokes.
Maestro brings to light the many forms of
society that form around music and why those societies are necessary in order
to create music that reaches listeners across the world. Maestro further highlights the role that audiences have in creating
yet another society, one in which music is a unifying theme in itself and can
act as a facilitator for other movements.
No comments:
Post a Comment